Anne Scheel
PhD student trying to figure out how we can make psych research more reproducible at . Co-mod of , co-blogger at
Last synced from Twitter 20m ago
Machine-Readable Study Descriptions
Scienceverse.github.io 3h 1 tweets
Generate and process machine-readable study descriptions.
Anne Scheel Personal highlight (took some artistic liberty to emphasise the point): THIS Really deep issue IMO, and even here tools are being developed to fix it — see & ’s fantastic scienceverse #REWARD2020 3h
Does Science Self-Correct?
Slideshare.net 11h 1 tweets
Ivan Oransky, Retraction Watch, presentation at EQUATOR Berlin conference 2020
Illusory truth effect systematic map
Google Docs 3d 2 tweets
We are conducting a systematic map of the illusory truth effect, also known as the validity or reiteration effect. The end result will be a catalogue of the research that has been conducted on this topic. The map will be available to the community...
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
bioRxiv 335d 8 tweets
Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as...
3
Anne Scheel Does peer review improve quality of reporting? et al. find slightly better reporting in peer-reviewed biomedical papers than preprints, *and* improvements from preprint to publication for the same papers #REWARD2020 10h
Title not found
Psyarxiv.com 3d 1 tweets
'Eugenics is possible' is not the same as 'eugenics is good'
Tom Chivers - UnHerd 4d 35 tweets
Rows over eugenics reveal how difficult it is to 'decouple' controversial concepts in our heads
Elisabeth Bik (Harbers-Bik LLC), Science Integrity Detective is creating Reports, blog posts, and scientific papers on science integrity
Patreon 110d 5 tweets
Become a patron of Elisabeth Bik (Harbers-Bik LLC), Science Integrity Detective today: Read posts by Elisabeth Bik (Harbers-Bik LLC), Science Integrity Detective and get access to exclusive content and experiences on the...
The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships
Science and Engineering Ethics 7d 2 tweets
Competition among scientists for funding, positions and prestige, among other things, is often seen as a salutary driving force in U.S. science. Its effects on scientists, their work and their relationships are seldom considered. Focus-group...
Tea: A High-level Language and Runtime System for Automating Statistical Analysis
arXiv.org 315d 3 tweets
Though statistical analyses are centered on research questions and hypotheses, current statistical analysis tools are not. Users must first translate their hypotheses into specific statistical tests and then perform API calls with functions and...
New Measure Rates Quality of Research Journals’ Policies to Promote Transparency and Reproducibility
Cos.io 11d 8 tweets
TOP Scores
Topfactor.org 11d 7 tweets
Center for Open Science TOP Scores - Transparency and Openness Promotion
TOP Guidelines
Cos.io 1213d 75 tweets
LnuOpen
Open.lnu.se 793d 2 tweets
1
Anne Scheel #AcademicValentines is red is blue getting totally owned by yellow from LNU 7d
Crackpot index
Math.ucr.edu 999d 9 tweets
1
Anne Scheel here's a 22-year-old total game changer I recently learned about via : The Crackpot Index 8d
Same Question, Different World: Replicating an Open Access Research Impact Study | Arendt | College & Research Libraries
Crl.acrl.org 324d 2 tweets
Same Question, Different World: Replicating an Open Access Research Impact Study
The Research Literature Looks too Good to be True
Psychology Today 11d 3 tweets
A new way of publishing academic research challenges the past literature.
Positive Results in Standard vs Registered Reports in Psychology
OSF 16d 2 tweets
We compared the rate of positive results (i.e., supported hypotheses) in Registered Reports with a sample of papers from the standard literature in Psychology using a method by Fanelli (2010). Hosted on the Open Science Framework
Anne Scheel 2) Study is preregistered & we share all data/code/materials in a way that hopefully allows full reproducibility & replicability. I'd be thrilled if ppl used our data to look into other fun stuff - it has quotes of all coded hypotheses & conclusions! 14/ 16d
Anne Scheel it's not comprehensive (doesn't include all published RRs to date & no non-psych RRs) but the dataset from our recent preprint might be a useful resource to find such papers: You could search RR abstracts and the quotes of the coded findings/results? 7d
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
Journals.plos.org 973d 3 tweets
The hypothesis of a Hierarchy of the Sciences with physical sciences at the top, social sciences at the bottom, and biological sciences in-between is nearly 200 years old. This order is intuitive and reflected in many features of academic life, but...
Anne Scheel So if RRs are successful at reducing pub bias and QRPs, we should expect them to have a (much) lower positive result rate than the standard literature! To test that, we used the same method as Fanelli (2010, ), who found 91.5% positive results in psych. 4/ 16d
Title not found
Psyarxiv.com 16d 3 tweets
29
Anne Scheel New preprint! Mitchell Schijen, , and I compared the rate of "positive" results (i.e., confirmed hypotheses) in Registered Reports to a sample of standard (non-RR) papers in psychology. We found a *very* large difference. Thread... 1/ 16d
A (non-viral) copyleft/sharealike license for open research data
Felix Schönbrodt - Nicebread 17d 1 tweets
by Felix Schönbrodt & Roland Ramthun The open availability of scientific material (such as research data, code, or other material) has often been identified as one cornerstone of a trustworthy, reproducible, and verifiable science. At the same time,...