The New Political Center

Join the movement for a new political center

Extreme polarization and the failure of the left and right to have conversation has created opportunity to build a new political center. A center that places civil, rational, intellectually honest conversation at it's core. Thinklab is bringing this community together and we're asking you (the public) to support the good work they're doing.

Core community beliefs and values:

  • Freedom of speech is fundamental — Speech is what we use to navigate a path towards a better society. Being able to speak freely and advocate for what you believe in is a fundamental human right. Without free speech it will be the most powerful in society dictating what the most vulnerable can and cannot say. Many on the political left want to carve out exemptions for "hate speech". But what is hate speech? Who gets to define it? Should it be illegal to criticize a religion? Should people be punished when something they say offends a minority?

  • Challenge ideas, don't demonize people — Censorship can come from the state, but it can also come from a culture that demonizes people for "wrong think". Many people today are afraid to voice their opinions for fear of being labeled a racist, sexist, Islamophobe, etc. Being accused of these terms carries the risk of being fired from a job or ostracized from social circles. When we demonize people it feeds resentment, prevents open discussion, and fundamentally breaks the marketplace of ideas. If we disagree with someone's ideas, we should challenge those ideas without demonizing the person.

  • Universities should not be "safe spaces" — A university is a place where students should have their ideas challenged. Offensive speakers should not be banned. Words should not be conflated with violence. Students should not be shielded from ideas via trigger warnings and safe spaces. Instead, we should seek to increase intellectual diversity on campus -- we should expose students to as many different viewpoints and arguments as possible. Intellectual diversity accelerates progress.

  • Truth must be held up as the highest value — Effective conversation requires representing ideas truthfully. To solve problems we must understand the problems and the world in which they exist. The moment we sacrifice truth in support of our cause, we undermine our very ability to have conversation that is likely to produce the results we want. If we avoid speaking the truth for fear of upsetting certain people, then we likely avoid the very conversation that is a necessity for helping the people we fear upsetting. If smart well intentioned people are ignoring inconvenient but obvious truths, we run the risk of pushing people towards other (perhaps less well intentioned) people who are willing to call it like they see it.

  • Science & reason are the path to truth — Science and reason are the best tools we have for figuring out what is true and what is not. An accurate understanding of the world informed by science and reason provides the fertile ground from which the best ideas can emerge. Belief in spite of counter evidence is not a virtue.

  • Minds are changed through intellectually honest civil conversation — For people to take on new information or change their mind they need to be in a state in which they are capable and willing to do so. If people feel like they are under attack conversation is unlikely to be useful. Effective conversation occurs when the participants engage with each other in the spirit of discovering truth together. This involves acknowledging good arguments from the other side and being intellectually honest.

  • Human rights are universal — Human rights should not vary based on what gender, race, or sexual orientation a person is born with or what culture they're born into. If it's wrong for women and gays to be discriminated against in America, it's wrong for them to be discriminated against in the Middle East. If certain cultures are oppressing people we should point that out and stand up for the people suffering within those cultures.

  • Equality of opportunity not outcome — Equality of opportunity is widely supported. However, issues arise when we start defining equality as equality of outcome. What happens if different groups of people have different interests in life (on average)? If that's true, enforcing equality of outcome implies pushing people into things they may not want to do, while unfairly discriminating against others. If people truly have the freedom to pursue what they want to do, we should celebrate their choices even if it creates unequal outcomes.

Share