Support for publishing signed reviews of scientific papers. Me: really bad idea for less privileged people at the bottom, since upsetting top people is career-damaging
The benefits of publishing peer review reports vastly outweigh any negative aspects (something many of us having been saying for years now..) #ASAPbio
. on the #BioPeerReview meeting organized by HHMI, , and to discuss transparency, recognition, and innovation in peer-review.
"Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews" - Good write-up in Science of last week's very productive peer review meeting - our survey gets another mention!
Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews - I support full open peer review, working on journals with this policy, inc. #Trialsjournal #SysRevsJ #PFSjournal #RIEjournal #DPRjournal: #ASAPbio
Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews - summary of #bioPeerReview meeting.
Should scientific journals share signed peer reviews of papers they publish? "We saw huge benefits to [publishing reviews] that outweigh the risks,” our said in summarizing a recent conversation among scientists. A look inside the debate
Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews
Debate at HHMI/ASAPbio meeting whether journals should publish signed peer reviews
Interesting: ‘to set up repository of experiments in #peerreview to help highlight successful practices’
Good, though I confess I’m frustrated that the major journal that’s used signed + open #peerreview for longest & tested it in RCTs - - isn’t mentioned
Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews
Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews
Nice summary in from the #PeerReview meeting at last week
Interesting idras and participants
Nice summary of the issues. We're moving in the right direction!Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews
Researchers support journals publishing signed peer reviews
Researchers debate whether journals should publish signed peer reviews
Good summary re debates on future of peer review. Pretty clear to me that despite trade-offs, public availability of reviews, and reviewer identity, will become prevalent in the future, to the benefit of science.
Researchers Debate Whether Journals Should Publish Signed Peer Reviews
Increasing evidence that research community supports publication of peer review reports