Self-organising peer review for preprints - A future paradigm for scholarly publishing #arXiv #PeerReview #Preprints #openaccess
Self-organising peer review for preprints - A future paradigm for scholarly publishing
Self-organising peer review for preprints - A future paradigm for scholarly publishing #PeerReview #OpenScience #Preprints
Self-organising peer review for preprints: A future paradigm for scholarly publishing |
Complimentary takes on preprints (& how to evaluate them) in and this morning. If data sharing is social and trust-based (as and I have argued), is preprint sharing similar? ,
Self-organising peer review for preprints - A future paradigm for scholarly publishing #OpenScience #OpenResearch
Self-organising peer review for preprints - A future paradigm for scholarly publishing #PeerReview
Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future paradigm for scholarly publishing by Wang LingFeng via
Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future paradigm for scholarly publishing
"how the development of preprint servers as self-organising peer review platforms could be the future of scholarly publication" These *particular* rules probably won't work. But with similar system, imagine the $ saved. Quality assessment, no impact factor
Self-organising peer review for preprints - A future paradigm for scholarly publishing
Self-organising peer review for preprints - A future paradigm for scholarly publishing
A rule based model for a self organised peer review system for preprints: All the rules here may have some drawbacks and its not clear whether the reviews will be open, but I welcome the attempt to envision a workable system.
"Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future paradigm for scholarly publishing" - #preprints
Yeah, this wouldn't be problematic at all ... "Self-organising peer review for preprints – A future paradigm for scholarly publishing"