Subscribe to read
Yet another bastion of science puts the interests of Big Oil before those of scientific integrity: UK
scoffs at concerns its sponsorship deals legitimise fossil fuel industry by rattling off, erm *checks notes*, industry talking points. 1/n
Director of the
, 'Even if the museum were lavishly publicly funded I would still want to have sponsorship from oil companies'. This unequivocal endorsement of those that have fuelled the #climatecrisis is deeply concerning...
Art Not Oil
The Director of the
AND the Director of the
have both defended the #climate crashing business plans of their oil sponsors. Our museums should be drawing a red line on fossil fuel funding NOT backing the polluters!
Art Not Oil
How can a
director ignore the science? He's chosen to back his Big Oil sponsors - companies investing billions in drilling for NEW oil and gas - over those that are demanding #ClimateJustice. 👎
BP or not BP?
director just threw shade at
for declaring a #ClimateEmergency, while defending his oily sponsors
! Is he following the same ‘science’ as the rest of us??? 🤔
THREAD | Last week, Director of the
Ian Blatchford said companies such as
'have the capital, geography, people and logistics to be major players in finding solutions to #climatechange'. But is he right? 1/6