“There are a lot of dedicated reporters at The Hill who do not share John Solomon’s views," tells after she says she will no longer deal with The Hill because it printed John Solomon's columns.
Rep. Jackie Speier ripped The Hill’s “reprehensible” publication of John Solomon’s columns after fielding a question from a Hill reporter during a break in today’s testimony
Bad look. Why punish a news reporter (with a good rep) for things that a former opinion contributor wrote?
Speier is being reasonable in refusing to bow to the journalism industry’s distinctions between news and opinions pages. That the Hill, NYT, Wall Street Journal and others allow nonsense to masquerade as fact in opinion pages is harmful and reprehensible.
Jackie Speier erupts at reporter for The Hill via