Subrena Smith recently argued that “evolutionary psychology, as it is currently understood, is…impossible.” Here is my response
Huge disconnect between Hagen's nuanced and fair response () and the more dismissive and handwavy replies from Coyne & Pinker IMO ( & ). Even when Coyne agrees with Smith he frames it dismissively
Here’s a critique. In short, her “matching problem” fatally ignores comparative evidence (in primate relatives e.g.) and normal abductive scientific reasoning.
on the importance of homology and the comparative method in testing adaptationist hypotheses