I am excited to share my op-ed in the coauthored with the amazing . The growing trend to deny the reality of biological sex is harmful to women, the LGB community, and children. It’s time to speak out against this toxic ideology.
The Dangerous Denial of Sex - WSJ
In humans, reproductive anatomy is unambiguously male or female at birth more than 99.98% of the time. No third type of sex cell exists in humans, and therefore there is no sex “spectrum” or additional sexes beyond male and female. Sex is binary.
Excellent article: “Those most vulnerable to sex denialism are children. When they’re taught that sex is grounded in identity instead of biology, sex categories can easily become conflated with regressive stereotypes of masculinity and femininity.”
I’ve gained many followers since this article was published in WSJ and disseminated by accounts I want nothing to do with. If you’re following me because you think I’m a religious, anti-choice, homophobic conservative, you will be sorely disappointed.
How strange it is that the only major US outlets publishing radical feminist arguments are the Wall St Journal and the National Review
Transgender ideology harms women, gays—and especially feminine boys and masculine girls, write &
The Dangerous Denial of Sex - WSJ
Uh oh. "Sex is binary" say and , evolutionary and developmental biologists, respectively. WSJ may be behind paywall.
Don’t deny sex on Valentines Day Well done
Recently we’ve seen stirrings in the mainstream US press towards acknowledging the importance of biological sex and exposing bogus claims of sex being a “spectrum”. Like this great article. #SexNotGender #LGBAllianceHighlights
Sex denialism has reached a fever pitch in the wake of 's support for sex-based rights. Denying biological sex isn't just false, it is regressive and harmful to those most vulnerable. Read my and 's essay to learn why.
I just tw'd this, but its worth repeating. I. "Sex is binary" say a developmental and evolutionary biologist. You can get alternative claims in Nature and other "quality" peer reviewed journals -- but they are *worse than wrong."
"Biologists and medical professionals need to stand up for the empirical reality of biological sex."
Thank you for being a powerful voice on this topic. You make many of the points that and I made in our recent essay. I think you and your supporters may find it useful and illuminating.
“It is false at every conceivable scale of resolution.” 👏
"When authoritative scientific institutions ignore or deny empirical fact in the name of social accommodation, it is an egregious betrayal to the scientific community they represent." Well said, and .
I agree with and . Throwing biology to the reality denying critical theory of radical activists is a betrayal of progress; scientific, moral and political.
Transgender ideology harms women, gays—and especially feminine boys and masculine girls, writes Colin M. Wright and Emma N. Hilton via
End. Of my thread that is. In the last couple of weeks, Princeton philosopher Peter Singer was deplatformed and was subject to an SJW academic blacklisting tw-attack for this WSJ editorial So, there is no reason to think its the end.
Here she is confusing the statement "there are only 2 sexes" (true) with "everyone can be unambiguously classified as male or female" (false). The following excerpt from my and ' essay explains this distinction as clearly as possible.
For those interested in understanding the various harms that sex denialism inflicts on women, homosexuals, and children, see my and 's recent essay below.
Look, I don’t study the biology of gender & sex, but I know enough to know that most of this article is culturally inappropriate & scientifically misleading. Any researchers want to write a rebuttal during quarantine?
The Dangerous Denial of Sex: Transgender ideology harms women, gays—and especially feminine boys and masculine girls. via &