INORMS REWG 106d ago
We’re delighted to announce the findings of our work to rate the World University Rankings against community-developed criteria. Read more on our blog post which includes a link to the qualitative and quantitative data.
5
Richard Holmes 105d ago
Rethinking the Rankings
5
Stephen Curry 104d ago
Looking forward to reading about the INORMS university ranking analysis in - this is a really essential piece of work for the whole HE sector.
2
Alex Holcombe 105d ago
Most university rankings are bunk. Great to see this shown comprehensively! "We were looking for rigorous methods, no ‘sloppy’ surveys, validity, sensitivity and honesty about uncertainty". , QS, and US News did worst in this section.
2
Rachel Ann Miles 105d ago
shares details about the initial findings of the 's efforts to rate the World University Rankings.
2
Ruth Harrison 105d ago
Excellent reflective post from and Richard Holmes on the SCOOPE project examining university rankings, . Punched the air reading one of the last paragraphs:
1
Simon Kerridge 106d ago
And the University Ranking Rankings (sort of) report is now out! thanks to and the too many numerous others who have worked on this. (My) Summary: the highest profile university rankings are least good
1
lorcan dempsey 104d ago
Interesting comparative evaluation of the major university ranking approaches > Rethinking the rankings – ARMA
0
Danny Kingsley 106d ago
RATING rankings - Lizzie Gadd and Richard Holmes share the initial findings of the INORMS Research Evaluation Working Group’s efforts to rate the World University Rankings NOTE 100% on each indicator is just *acceptable*, not a goal.
0