"What parent wants to have a child who’s going to be playing for a bottom-tier school with bottom-tier academics in the armpit of the United States? I want to be polite. But there’s no way in hell.” -- The unfiltered entitlement of affluent white parents.
“It’s more about status maintenance, by any means necessary.” A deep dive into the expansive niche sports endeavors among wealthy, mostly white families to get their kids into highly selective colleges. @JessicaCalarco @allison_pugh
To anyone outside of the USA, the weirdest thing about this story is the idea that being good at sport should ever have any connection to university admission
“Over the past decade,” Ruth S. Barrett writes, “the for-profit ecosystem that has sprouted up around athletic recruiting at top-rung universities has grown so excessively ornate, so circular in its logic, that it’s become self-defeating.”
Every time I think I've got a handle on how deranged the world of American elite college admissions is, I discover that it's actually far more deranged than that.
"Of Princeton’s 5,300 undergraduates, approximately 930—or 17.5 percent—are recruited players"
I've never understood why American colleges care so much about admitting athletes, much less so from niche sports, except perhaps as an income screener...
ANNALS OF MERITOCRACY: What do you do when you're an upper middle class Connecticut parent and your kids are crowded out of good colleges by “environmental dashboards” and “adversity scores"?
Great (funny) piece from Ruth Barrett
Random but timely item in my feed. This is what you're escaping by leaving the US: the neurotic obsessions of the upper-class precariat, projected on their children.
In Europe, your child's outcomes aren't an either/or between gig worker or Google PM.
This is an excellent look at an incredibly unhealthy environment & set of norms. One thing it doesn't cover: how many of these young people quit their sport after a year or two at college, either from burnout or because they never wanted to play at all.
"fencer received a 'likely' letter from an Ivy. Shortly thereafter, the university … began to get letters saying that the athlete … faked competition results. … correct[ed] the falsehood … 'nothing to worry about. This actually happens all the time.’ ”
“Over the past decade,” Ruth S. Barrett writes, “the for-profit ecosystem that has sprouted up around athletic recruiting at top-rung universities has grown so excessively ornate, so circular in its logic, that it’s become self-defeating.”
The special boost for recruited athletes, known as preferential admission, can be equivalent to hundreds of SAT points.
The admission process at elite colleges is deeply problematic and the parents who try to game the system are insufferable.