The radical implications of the Supreme Court’s new ruling on Wisconsin mail-in ballots.
So, literally as Amy Coney Barrett was being confirmed, the Supreme Court handed down a radical attack on more than a century of voting rights law.
Friendly reminder that if you're a fan of a "living constitution" then you can't appeal to precedent or tradition as an authority.
The radical implications of the Supreme Court’s new ruling on Wisconsin mail-in ballots: the ruling threatens a century of voting rights law. via
Republicans never believed in “states rights”. They only believe in cheating to win.
Now the court is making it easier for the country's conservative minority to entrench itself.