David PakmanHey @timcast lots valid points in this vid but including my name in the list of those @rubinreport "won't debate" for good reason is wrong. I haven't called for debate, but said I'm interested in a conversation and have specific things I'd love to discuss
--Allan Lichtman, political historian, Professor at American University, and author of the book "The Case for Impeachment," joins David to discuss his predic...
David PakmanHad @AllanLichtman on yesterday, who says the most likely 2020 result is Trump re-election IF Dems don't file articles if impeachment, even presuming the Senate doesn't vote to convict (which they won't). Thoughts on his analysis?
Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-Mass.) almost single-minded focus on policy and her ambitious field organizing may be starting to pay off.
David PakmanI've been surprised it took this long for Warren to get momentum. She's been super strong on detailed and specific policy proposals that (mostly) make sense. Huge weakness for her is she's not very relatable or likeable, and I'm unsure she's a good debater
David PakmanOn the Friday show I answer audience questions. Here's an example from last week: youtube.com/watch?v=U6rayZ… If you reply to this post with your question, it might be answered on tomorrow's show
David PakmanIn this clip, Hillary offers the thought experiment, "what if a Dem asked China to hack Trump's taxes." The right is claiming Hillary asked China to hack Trump. Are they (1) deliberately disingenuous or (2) actually that stupid?
David PakmanWatching Barr tie himself into a pretzel under Kamala's questioning is pure gold. So you ARE saying that a witness in the probe decided about prosecutions in that same probe, or you aren't?
--Joe Rogan exposes Ben Shapiro on the issues of gay marriage and "naturalistic" explanations for religious stories in hilarious clips from a recent appearan...
David PakmanHey @joerogan , we did a commentary on a recent interview of yours, hasn't published yet but already hit us with a copyright claim. Would you be willing to have that retracted? It's bad for us. Link is youtube.com/watch?v=keuNlk… (not yet published)